There’s a little bit of history behind what we have now, so sorry for rather a long post. Please skip the article and go to “The current status” paragraph if you just want to see the numbers.
Initially, we had some hardware and custom scripts for starting VMs there.
Then we had a Fedora-infra OpenStack cloud with x86_64 and ppc64le architecture support, those days it was living on fedorainfracloud.org hostname. Mirek started the OpenStack installation in 2014. That cloud was giving us several tens of instances those days (concurrently about 10 ppc64le and 30 x86_64, from what I barely remember).
Unfortunately, the lab which hosted the cloud was planned for relocation, and we had to evacuate OpenStack in 2020. We were offered to host the Copr build system in AWS under the Fedora Infrastructure community account. The migration started late in 2019 (when we began starting builder VMs in AWS) and finished in Feb 2020 (when the infrastructure, like frontend, backend, etc. was moved).
A big benefit of the move to AWS was that we newly got native support for the aarch64 architecture (only x86_64 and aarch64 are available in AWS). But we lost the ppc64le architecture, as those OpenStack hypervisors were shut down. AWS also gave us a possibility to scale horizontally, so in peak situations, we handled about 120 concurrent builds.
The transition to AWS brought several approaches, namely, we didn’t have the only source of computational power – we had two (AWS and OpenStack, at least for the transition period). At that time we started using the Resalloc server for (pre)allocating VMs.
The use of the Resalloc server is nicer for VM quota, we don’t have to start all the VMs in advance when they are not used. The server keeps just some of the VMs pre-allocated (so new builds don’t wait till the VM is started) and is able to allocate more when needed.
fedorainfracloud.org OpenStack was finally
discontinued, and till now we don’t have any
OpenStack in hand.
During the last few months, Fedora Infra folks began racking the machines from the old OpenStack cloud into a new RDU lab. It allows us to finally install them and gives us an opportunity to grow again on those “in-house” machines. We already finished the installation of four x86_64 boxes (one died in the meantime and is waiting for HW service) and we managed to start 20 builder VMs on each of those machines (so we have an additional 60 x86_64 builders now).
The fact we have those builders now, we don’t have to depend on that many builders in AWS. So first - we decreased the maximum numbers of AWS builders and second - we also migrated the rest instances from On-demand to Spot (about 30% of On-Demand price).
The most recent news is that during the last week we finally enabled one of the Power8 machines (former OpenStack, too) that gives us now a set of 15 concurrent ppc64le builders.
The current status
- 60 x86_64 builders preallocated (on 3 working, in-house, hypervisors)
- from 5 to 30 On-Demand x86_64 AWS builders
- from 20 to 60 Spot x86_64 AWS builders
- from 2 to 8 On-Demand aarch64 AWS builders (2 always preallocated)
- from 6 to 30 Spot aarc64 builders (6 always preallocated)
- 15 ppc64le builder machines
This gives us from 108 to 203 machines, depending on the current utilization (the more machines are used, the more are started).
We should have another Power8 machine installed soon. By a rough guess, this should give us another set of 15 ppc64le builders (We tweaked the thin-provisioning setup on the LibVirt level, overcommitted RAM, so we should get more builder machines than before on OpenStack). We will probably consider raising the limit from 15 to 20 builders.
One x86_64 hypervisor should get HW vendor service. We also believe that we should handle another +10 builders more on each x86 hypervisor. It means that there will be +30 (on the fixed box) and +3x10 x86_64 builders (120 in-house in total) - so it will decrease the AWS budget a bit more.
The current implementation of the Resalloc server pre-allocates virtual machines, and delegates the Copr build tasks there randomly. This is an economically sub-optimal process though - we should instead primarily use the in-house builders (the cheapest power), then Spot instances, and only if all are taken - take the most expensive On-Demand instances. We’ll implement this prioritization soon.
We are currently discussing possibilities around the s390x architecture, and also we have two aarch64 boxes that could be racked to do native armhfp builds. So eventually, we could get native support for all the architectures supported by Fedora - even though this is not yet certain/near future.